ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Variant calling from RNA-Seq data reveals allele-specific differential expression of pathogenic cancer variants.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ESR1 mutations are associated with enhanced MTORC1 signaling in a context-dependent manner.Communications biology · 2026Article
- 5' Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (5' RACE)-Based Targeted RNA Sequencing Assay for the Analysis of Clinically Relevant Alterations in Lung Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Towards an ecosystem of clinical decision support tools for precision cancer medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Confounding factors in assessing the enriched expression of somatic mutant alleles in bulk tumor samples.Genome research · 2026Article
- Small Nucleotide Variant Analysis Using RNA Fusion Panel (SMURF): Making the Most of RNAseq Data in Solid Tumours.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic variants play a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of many diseases, including cancer. Detecting these variants is the first step in understanding their contribution to disease mechanisms. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become a crucial assay in cancer research, offering insights beyond those provided by DNA sequencing. This study introduces VarRNA, a novel method that utilizes RNA-Seq data to classify single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions from tumor transcriptomes.
methodsVarRNA distinguishes transcriptome variants as germline, somatic, or artifact using a combination of two XGBoost machine learning models. These models were trained and validated using a cohort of pediatric cancer samples with paired tumor and normal DNA exome sequencing data serving as ground truth. We performed additional validation on RNA-Seq data from two distinct cancer datasets, demonstrating that VarRNA outperforms existing RNA variant calling methods.
resultsVarRNA identifies 50% of the variants detected by exome sequencing and detects unique RNA variants absent in paired tumor and normal DNA exome data. Some variants classified by VarRNA exhibit variant allele frequencies distinct from the corresponding DNA exome data. Strikingly, this phenomenon is prevalent in cancer-driving genes, where VarRNA analysis of the RNA-Seq data reveals the variant allele expression as much higher than expected based on the exome sequencing data.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the potential of RNA-Seq not only to uncover clinically relevant genetic variants but also to offer a deeper understanding of disease-specific expression dynamics that influence cancer pathogenesis, with implications for prognosis and therapeutic strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.