How secure are your health devices-stopping wearables becoming a personal and national security risk?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Regulatory Approaches to Cybersecurity Risk Management for AI-Enabled Medical Device Software in Korea, the United States, and the European Union: Comparative Document Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026
   Article
2. Enhancing the resilience of remote patient monitoring and hospital-at-home systems: a digital-twin-based framework.npj health systems · 2026
   Review
3. Cybersecurity requirements for medical devices in the EU and US - A comparison and gap analysis of the MDCG 2019-16 and FDA premarket cybersecurity guidance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
   Article
4. Use of Wireless Smart Devices in Remote Monitoring of Chronic Wounds: A Scoping Review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.