ArticleCommunications biology2025
The latitudinal variation in amphibian speciation rates revisited.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anthropocene Imperilment of Ancient Diversity and Evolutionary Potential in Terrestrial Vertebrates.Research square · 2025Article
- Regional Climate Drives Spatial Variation in Species Richness in the Most Diverse Family of Neotropical Snakes (Colubroidea: Dipsadidae).Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The latitudinal variation in amphibian speciation rates revisited.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Speciation can increase regional species richness, however, our knowledge of how and why speciation rates vary across space is still incomplete. Using comprehensive information on species distributions and their phylogenetic relationships, we describe the global spatial patterns of variation in amphibian speciation rates and explore their ecological determinants. We find that overall mean speciation rates in amphibians increase with latitude. This pattern is largely determined by anurans, the most diverse amphibian order. Salamanders, nevertheless, speciate faster in the tropics, whereas caecilians did not exhibit any relationship with latitude. Despite the overall inverse latitudinal trend in mean speciation rates of amphibians, tip-level maximum speciation rates are not necessarily restricted to higher latitudes and can be found in different regions across the globe. Among bioregions, higher mean speciation rates are associated with high past climatic velocity and topographic complexity, both factors potentially promoting isolation, an important primer for speciation. Our results suggest that the emerging inverse pattern of speciation rates in amphibians is likely driven by the combination of a few rapidly speciating clades distributed in higher latitudes and numerous clades in lower latitudes showing heterogeneous rates that, when averaged, pull down the estimations of mean speciation in the areas where they occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.