ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel deep learning framework with artificial protozoa optimization-based adaptive environmental response for wind power prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Metaheuristic Optimization of a DWT-BiLSTM Architecture for Wind Speed Forecasting: A Statistical Benchmark with Component Ablation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Modeling Approaches: From Statistical Models to Deep Learning for Locust and Grasshopper Forecasting.Insects · 2026Review
- DTCMMA: Efficient Wind-Power Forecasting Based on Dimensional Transformation Combined with Multidimensional and Multiscale Convolutional Attention Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate very short-term wind power forecasting is critical for the reliable integration of renewable energy into modern power systems. However, the inherent variability and non-linearity of wind power data pose significant challenges. To address these, this study proposes a novel hybrid deep learning framework, IAPO-LSTM, which combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for spatial feature extraction and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) for temporal sequence modeling. The model is optimized using an enhanced Artificial Protozoa Optimizer (IAPO) augmented with an Adaptive Environmental Response Mechanism (AERM), which dynamically adjusts exploration and exploitation strategies based on the problem landscape to improve convergence and hyperparameter tuning efficiency. The proposed IAPO-LSTM model was evaluated on four real-world datasets-NREL WIND, EMD WIND, WWSIS, and ERCOT GRID-and benchmarked against six state-of-the-art forecasting models. Results demonstrate that IAPO-LSTM achieved the lowest forecasting errors across all datasets, with Mean Absolute Error (MAE) as low as 2.78, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 4.50, and Theil's Inequality Coefficient (TIC) of 0.0292 on the ERCOT dataset. Additionally, the model demonstrated faster inference times and better statistical significance (p < 0.005) compared to baseline methods. These outcomes confirm that IAPO-LSTM is not only highly accurate but also efficient and robust for real-time wind power forecasting applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.