ArticleScientific reports2025
Toxicological assessment of omethoate insecticide in Allium cepa L.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research provides a comprehensive understanding of the toxicity of omethoate, a widely used organophosphate pesticide, in a non-target test organism, Allium cepa L. In this study, the control group received distilled water, while the treatment groups were exposed to omethoate at concentrations of 2 mg/L, 3.1 mg/L and 5.7 mg/L for 72 h, respectively.At the end of the experimental period, physiological, cytogenetic, biochemical, and meristematic cell damage level analyses were carried out. Rooting ratio (%), root elongation, and weight gain in the omethoate-treated groups were notably reduced compared to the control. The degree of growth inhibition became more pronounced as the concentration of omethoate increased. Omethoate caused cytogenetic damage, considering the increased micronucleus, chromosomal aberrations, DNA damage, and decreased mitotic index levels compared to control group values. Chromosomal aberrations observed after omethoate exposure were ranked from most to least dense, such as sticky chromosome, vagrant chromosome, fragment, bridge, and unequal chromatin distribution. Omethoate treatment promoted a rise in both activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase and malondialdehyde levels, which are indicators of oxidative stress. Among the other biochemical parameters examined, proline level increased, and chlorophyll a and b levels decreased in omethoate-treated groups. The adverse effects on genotoxicity and biochemical parameters increased as the dose of omethoate increased. The disorders induced by omethoate pesticide in root tip meristem cells were epidermis cell damage, flattened nucleus, cortex cell damage, thickened cortex cell wall, and thickened conduction tissue. According to the findings of this study, omethoate is a chemical that causes multifaceted and dose-dependent toxicity in A. cepa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.