ArticleScientific reports2025
Suppressing spectator-induced dephasing through optimized dynamical decoupling implementation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamical decoupling (DD) is a well-established technique for protecting quantum systems from environmental noise. DD effectively mitigates decoherence in superconducting quantum computing systems, where precise implementation plays a crucial role in optimizing its performance. This study investigates how DD implementation timing and sequence design critically affect spectator-induced dephasing from adjacent qubits. We find that excited states of adjacent qubits dramatically degrade operational qubit coherence. We demonstrate that DD sequences applied to adjacent qubits effectively suppress this dephasing. This protection persists even when adjacent qubits remain in superposition states during the sequence. Through systematic characterization of Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequences, we show that implementation timing strongly impacts protection effectiveness. While optimal timing achieves substantial coherence enhancement, improper sequence delays can severely degrade protection. Our results highlight the importance of precise timing control for implementing DD in optimizing multi-qubit quantum circuits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.