Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40436963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Precision of post-operative localization of deep brain stimulation electrodes.

Andrej Lasica, Pavel Filip, Kristína Burdová, Josef Mana, Filip Růžička, Dušan Urgošík, Karsten Mueller, Dimitra Kiakou, Robert Jech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrej LasicaDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel FilipDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristína BurdováDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josef ManaDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Filip RůžičkaDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dušan UrgošíkDepartment of Radiology, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karsten MuellerDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dimitra KiakouDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert JechDepartment of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 30, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic. jech@cesnet.cz.

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy LX22NPO5107Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky CZ-DRO-VFN64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools for post-operative localization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes may be of major benefit in the evaluation of the stimulation area. However, little is known about their precision. This study compares 3 different software packages used for DBS electrode localization. T1-weighted MRI images before and after the implantation of the electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus for DBS in 105 Parkinson's disease patients were processed using the pipelines implemented in Lead-DBS, SureTune4, and Brainlab. Euclidean distance between active contacts determined by individual software packages and in repeated processing by the same and by a different operator was calculated. Furthermore, Dice coefficient for overlap of volume of tissue activated (VTA) was determined for Lead-DBS. Medians of Euclidean distances between estimated active contact locations in inter-software package comparison ranged between 1.5 mm and 2 mm. Euclidean distances in within-software package intra- and inter-rater assessments were 0.6-1 mm and 1-1.7 mm, respectively. Median intra- and inter-rater Dice coefficients for VTAs were 0.78 and 0.75, respectively. Since the median distances are close to the size of the target nucleus, any clinical use should be preceded by careful review of the outputs.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSoftwareSubthalamic NucleusDeep brain stimulationElectrode localizationMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingParkinson’s diseaseSoftware comparisonSubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID40436963
PMCPMC12120071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.