ArticleScientific data2025
Root-associated microbiota of decline-affected and asymptomatic Pinus sylvestris trees.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Root-associated microbiota of decline-affected and asymptomatic Pinus sylvestris trees.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest decline is a worldwide phenomenon affecting many species such as Pinus sylvestris. Although it is driven by multiple stressors, the role of tree associated microorganisms remains still unclear. To reduce this knowledge gap we obtained amplicon sequences of the microbiota inhabiting the rhizosphere soil and root endosphere (bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS2) of decline-affected and asymptomatic P. sylvestris trees in spring and summer. The dataset comprised a total of 384 samples from three mountainous areas which yielded an average of 59,592.3 ± 7,371 and 56,894.3 ± 12,983.5 (spring and summer) bacterial and 74,827.9 ± 12,095.4 and 85,363.9 ± 14,199.3 (spring and summer) fungal raw reads, resulting in 23,982.4 ± 11,312.4 (spring) and 17,921.8 ± 10,802.7 (summer) bacterial and 50,571.1 ± 10,499.5 (spring) and 49,509.4 ± 12,673.8 (summer) fungal quality-filtered sequences. These data and the corresponding metadata could be used to identify pine decline bioindicators, to develop novel diagnosis tools of specific microorganisms and could serve as reference against which to compare other microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.