ArticleScientific reports2025
Prolonged effects of adenoviral vector priming on T-cell cytokine production in heterologous adenoviral vector/mRNA COVID-19 vaccination regimens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Long-term humoral and cellular immune responses following Covaxin vaccination: a 2-year prospective longitudinal study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Heterologous ORFV-Ad26 vaccination broadens antibody breadth and amplifies cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 spike.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccine platforms were used for the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in many countries. However, the distinct immunogenic properties on these platforms remain less understood. We traced neutralizing antibodies, memory B cells, and T cells longitudinally in cohorts that received either mRNA (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) or adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1) vaccines with homologous or heterologous regimens (total 9 groups, n = 26-28 for each group) at 4 weeks interval. The priming and boosting effects on various immune parameters were comparably assessed between mRNA and adenoviral vector platforms. We found that initial priming by adenoviral vector vaccine elicited robust T cell responses, but B cell responses, including antibody titers, were relatively lower than those elicited by mRNA priming. The dissociation between T cell and antibody responses were exaggerated at greater extents after the homologous booster with the adenoviral vector vaccine, resulting in 5-19-fold lower antibody titers despite comparable spike-specific T cell numbers at day 28 after the boost. Robust IFN-γ and few IL-2 and IL-5 production characterized T cell functionality primed by adenoviral vector. Boosting with mRNA vaccines restored their IL-2 and IL-5 production at some extents, but the IL-5 T cell responses elicited by adenoviral vector/mRNA heterologous regimen waned faster than those by mRNA homologous regimen. Thus, our data revealed that the cytokine production of helper T cells was skewed by adenoviral vector priming, leading to the attenuated IL-2 and IL-5 responses which were prolonged even after mRNA boosting, suggesting an imprinting of T-cell functionality depending on the vaccine platform used for initial priming. These results highlight the importance of selecting vaccine platforms based on the immunogenic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.