Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40436894›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Toxicity of pharmaceutical micropollutants on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using blood biomarkers.

Walaa M Shaalan, Alaa El-Din H Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Walaa M ShaalanZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha, 13518, Egypt.
Alaa El-Din H SayedDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, 71516, Egypt. alaasayed@aun.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of pharmaceutical compounds in aquatic environments has become a notable ecological issue, with compounds such as bromazepam, naproxen, metoprolol, and sotalol being of particular concern due to their prevalence and potential biological effects on non-target species. This study aims to evaluate the effects of these pharmaceuticals on common carp (Cyprinus carpio), focusing on cytogenicity, genotoxicity, hematological, biochemical, neurological, and immunological responses. Juvenile carp were exposed to 15.54 µg/L bromazepam, 14.40 µg/L naproxen, 5.76 µg/L metoprolol, and 3.33 µg/L sotalol, respectively. Hematological analysis revealed significant reductions in red blood cell counts and hemoglobin levels, indicating potential anemia, especially in fish exposed to naproxen. Biochemical assays showed increased levels of albumin, globulin, and enzymes indicative of liver stress in exposed groups. Antioxidant defense enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase showed significant activity increases, suggesting oxidative stress. Apoptosis assays demonstrated elevated erythrocyte apoptosis, particularly in the naproxen group, which also exhibited the highest DNA damage. These findings highlight the ecological significance of pharmaceutical contamination and highlight the urgent need for thorough environmental risk assessments that take into account the health of both organisms and ecosystems, as well as the creation of mitigation plans for their detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCarpsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsApoptosisDNA DamageOxidative StressBiomarkersWater Pollutants, ChemicalApoptosis cometAquatic environmentCatalaseCyprinus carpioGenotoxicityLDHSuperoxide dismutase

Identifiers

PMID40436894
PMCPMC12119934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.