ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Questionnaire Survey of Facilities Conducted among Members of the Japanese Society for Stroke Surgery on Surgical Intervention for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is limited high-level evidence guiding the surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, leaving the decision to the clinician's discretion. To understand treatment practices, a questionnaire survey was conducted among members of the Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke. This survey examined stroke care systems at various institutions, stroke numbers, and treatment details of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage from January 2021 to December 2023. We examined data from 42 facilities, compared with 10 primary stroke centers cores and 32 non-primary stroke center cores. The total number of physicians involved in stroke care (primary stroke center cores vs. non-primary stroke center cores, median interquartile range; 18 [11-26] vs. 8 [4-14], p = 0.01), stroke specialists (8 [5-12] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.03), and supervising stroke surgeons (2 [1-2] vs. 1 [0-2], p = 0.008) was significantly higher in the primary stroke center cores group. Overall, 36,412 patients with stroke were hospitalized: 68% had cerebral infarction, 22% cerebral hemorrhage, 8% subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 2% other strokes. The locations of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage varied, with the putamen (31%), thalamus (25%), and lobe (24%) being predominantly affected. Non-invasive treatment was more prevalent in non-primary stroke center cores for most hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage types, except for putaminal and brainstem hemorrhages. Surgical interventions were more common in primary stroke center cores, with craniotomies, neuroendoscopic surgeries, and ventricular drainage being preferred for cerebellar hemorrhage (28%), caudate nucleus hemorrhage (20%), and intraventricular hemorrhage (41%). This study highlights the treatment variability of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage between primary stroke center and non-primary stroke center cores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.