Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40436458›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Prehospital antibiotics and intravenous fluids for patients with sepsis: protocol for a 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial.

Damon C Scales, Anna Rogowsky, Lisa Burry, Jim Christenson, Nick Daneman, Ian R Drennan, Morgan Hillier, Sandra Jenneson, Gail Klein, Tony Mazzulli and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03068741 (Paramedic Initiated Treatment of Sepsis Targeting Out-of-hospital Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03068741 phase4completednot on this map

Paramedic Initiated Treatment of Sepsis Targeting Out-of-hospital Patients (PITSTOP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr. Damon ScalesRan2020 to 2025Enrolled2,061ConditionsSevere Sepsis or Septic ShockArmsComparison 1: Prehospital Ceftriaxone, Comparison 1: Placebo, Comparison 2: Liberal fluids, Comparison 2: Conservative fluids
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Damon C ScalesDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada damon.scales@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7101-3958
Anna RogowskyCentre for Clinical Trial Support, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa BurryInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jim ChristensonEmergency Medicine, University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nick DanemanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3764
Ian R DrennanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Morgan HillierDepartment of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra JennesonThe University of British Columbia - Vancouver Campus, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gail KleinCentre for Clinical Trial Support, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tony MazzulliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philip MoranCentral East Prehospital Care Program, Lakeridge Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew M MorrisDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruxandra PintoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon D RubenfeldDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher W SeymourThe CRISMA Center, UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rob StenstromUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
P Richard VerbeekDepartment of Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheldon CheskesSunnybrook Centre for Prehospital Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrompt recognition and treatment of patients with sepsis improve survival. Patients transported to hospital with sepsis often do not receive treatment until they are assessed in emergency departments. Initiation of treatments by paramedics at the point of first contact may improve outcomes for these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study design involves two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted using a 2×2 factorial design comparing use of (1) early intramuscular ceftriaxone versus placebo and (2) an early liberal intravenous fluid strategy (up to 2 L normal saline) versus usual care resuscitation guided by paramedic medical directives. Patients who are ≥18 years of age will be eligible for inclusion if they have sepsis, defined as (1) paramedic suspicion of infection, (2) fever (temperature ≥38.0°C measured by paramedic or history of fever during the previous 24 hours), and (3) hypotension: SBP <100 mm Hg. The primary outcome is mortality prior to hospital discharge or within 90 days of admission. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at 90 days after enrolment; organ dysfunction during first 24 hours (mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy, dialysis) and hospitalisation (mechanical ventilation; dialysis); rates and duration of hospital admission; rates of ICU admission during index hospitalisation; discharge destination; proportion of patients with positive blood cultures obtained in hospital (first 24 hours); microbiological profile including distribution of microorganism species and resistant organisms; proportion of patients receiving additional antibiotics within 6 hours and within 24 hours of hospital admission; frequency distribution of first antibiotics (if any) delivered within 24 hours of hospital arrival; mean time to antibiotics delivered within 24 hours of hospital arrival (if any); proportion of patients receiving fluid bolus (>250 mL) within 24 hours of hospital arrival; total amount of crystalloid infused during transport and first 24 hours of hospitalisation; and proportion of enrolled patients not suspected to have sepsis or infection by emergency department physicians. Safety outcomes include the proportion of patients with pulmonary oedema during transport to hospital and on initial chest X-ray and the proportion of patients with anaphylaxis or suspected allergic reactions to study medication. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved through Clinical Trials Ontario's streamlined ethics review process (board of record, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre). It will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines and regulatory requirements. The final results will be disseminated to participating paramedic services through educational materials, presentations and interactive training. We anticipate our trial will achieve wide dissemination through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and presentation at international conferences targeting the fields of prehospital and emergency medicine, resuscitation and critical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03068741.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneEmergency Medical ServicesFluid TherapySepsisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneAntibioticsINFECTIOUS DISEASESRandomized Controlled TrialSepsis

Identifiers

PMID40436458
PMCPMC12121580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.