ArticleBMJ open2025
How are clinical exercise physiology postgraduate courses taught and assessed in the UK? A multimethod qualitative exploration.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDevelopment of clinical skills in areas, such as exercise risk stratification, testing, prescription, monitoring and outcome assessment, is vital for patient safety and clinical effectiveness in clinical exercise physiology (CEP). This study explored how current CEP courses are being taught and assessed and to identify potential best practice recommendations from a variety of stakeholders
methodsQualitative methods were employed to explore the thoughts of CEPs, academics and current students regarding the teaching and assessment of CEPs in the UK. Research design involved (1) semistructured interviews with students (n=16) and (2) focus groups with academics (n=8) and CEP (n=5) stakeholders. Data obtained were audio recorded using a portable Dictaphone and transcribed verbatim, then thematically analysed manually.
resultsThree themes: (1) in situ learning/real-world practice (working with patients and specialist practitioners); (2) programme design (scaffold learning and integrated modules) and (3) teaching approach (simulated learning and research competency) were generated concerning teaching methods and approaches across CEP postgraduate degrees. The current use of simulated tasks for the delivery of taught content was identified as lacking effectiveness, with clinical placements identified as being the most important source of knowledge and skill attainment due to the real-world exposure to patients and practitioners. Clinical placements and simulated learning were recognised as the two main methods of problem-based learning used to develop student knowledge, skills and competency to practice. Two themes (placement tariffs/assessors in situ and role play/simulation) were identified for the assessment of students.
conclusionClinical placements remain the optimal method for developing the knowledge, skills and competency to practice for student CEPs. However, suitable placements remain limited, and novel approaches such as university-led exercise services require consideration for student competency development. A standardised and accredited training pathway from undergraduate through to postgraduate level should be explored to allow student competency to be developed over a longer period, to enhance knowledge, skills and competency on graduation and registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.