ArticleOpen heart2025
Neighbourhood deprivation and cardiometabolic outcomes in the UK Biobank: differences by sex and ethnicity.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Area deprivation, social vulnerability, and post-pregnancy blood pressure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the associations of deprived neighbourhoods with all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and to investigate whether these associations were independently and concurrently stratified by sex and ethnicity.
methodsData came from the UK Biobank, a prospective cohort study of over 500 000 participants aged 22-69 across the UK between 2006 and 2010. The follow-up time was calculated from each participant's enrolment at baseline until the first occurrence of a diagnosis of each death, incident or the censor date (31 December 2020). All-cause mortality, incident total CVD, ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) were the outcomes defined based on the International Classification of Diseases. Deprived neighbourhoods were categorised into four groups: least deprived (referent), somewhat deprived, deprived, and most deprived neighbourhoods. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of deprived neighbourhoods with each outcome. Analyses were stratified by sex and ethnicity separately and simultaneously.
resultsA total of 261 954 participants were included. Participants had a mean follow-up of 14.3 years for all-cause mortality (3 745 307 person-years, 9933 deaths) and 12.7 years for total CVD incidence (3 321 619 person-years, 64 748 events). Those in the most deprived neighbourhoods (compared with the least) had a 31%, 13%, 15% and 34% greater risk of all-cause mortality, incident total CVD, IHD and CeVD, respectively. Patterns of associations were somewhat similar by sex, yet varied by ethnicity. The overall results were consistent with the white cohort but not for the other cohorts.
conclusionsThis study indicated that individuals living in highly deprived neighbourhoods may have an elevated risk of all-cause mortality and incident CVD, particularly among the white cohort but not other cohorts. Future research should focus on efforts to invest in deprived areas to alleviate the burden of all-cause mortality and CVD incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.