ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2025
Towards large nuclear imaging system optical simulations with optiGAN, a generative adversarial network.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OptiGAN for crystal arrays: physics-informed generative modeling of optical photon transport in PET detector arrays.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optical Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are essential for modeling light transport in radiation detectors used in nuclear imaging and high-energy physics. However, full-system simulations remain computationally prohibitive due to the need to track optical photons across large detector arrays. To address this challenge, optiGAN, a conditional Wasserstein generative adversarial network (GAN) was developed to accelerate detailed optical simulations while maintaining high fidelity. Our approach trains optiGAN on high-dimensional optical photon distributions generated using GATE 10, the new Python-based version of the well-established MC simulation toolkit. Two datasets were constructed from 511 keV interactions in bismuth germanate crystals: one included multidimensional features (spatial coordinates, kinetic energy, and time), and another focused solely on time distributions. OptiGAN employs a combination of conditional GAN and Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) to enhance training stability and accuracy. Model performance was evaluated using the Jensen-Shannon distance, achieving similarity scores exceeding 90% for most photon properties, with further improvements when focusing exclusively on timing distributions. To validate optiGAN ability to reproduce system-level detector performance, its output was used to generate silicon photomultiplier signals using a validated SiPM simulation toolkit. The resulting energy and timing resolutions closely matched those obtained from full MC simulations, demonstrating that optiGAN preserves key detector characteristics while improving computational efficiency by up to two orders of magnitude. These findings establish optiGAN as a promising tool for large-scale detector simulations, enabling rapid evaluation of new detector technologies, also because it has been integrated into the new version of GATE. Future work will focus on further optimizing model performance and extending its applicability to system-level nuclear imaging simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.