ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2025
Effect of L-carnitine supplementation on fertility outcomes among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional Regulation of Ovarian Bioenergetics: Implications for Reproductive Aging and Female Infertility.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Roles and Safety Profiles of Non-Vitamin Antioxidant Supplements in Female Infertility: A Narrative Review.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the effect of L-carnitine (LC) supplementation on the fertility outcomes of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Online databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched to identify eligible RCTs published until March 2024. A dose-response meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Meta-regression was also performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity based on the LC dose and duration of treatment. The pooled analysis included eight RCTs with 1,046 participants. The LC-treated group had significantly increased chemical and clinical pregnancy rates, ovulation rate, progesterone levels, number of preovulatory follicles >17 mm in diameter, and endometrial thickness compared to the untreated groups. The meta-analysis model indicated that LC supplementation did not change the serum levels of estrogen and testosterone; however, the dose-response meta-analysis indicated that prolonged LC intake significantly increased estrogen levels. LC supplementation has significant effects on fertility outcomes of women with PCOS. Additional large-scale longer RCTs are required to confirm the findings of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.