ArticleNeonatology2025
Transfusion Practices in 12 Neonatal Networks: Are We Closer to Adopting a Restrictive Transfusion Approach?
Article in Neonatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variation in Stabilization and Resuscitation Practices at Birth of Preterm Infants Among 12 National or Regional Neonatal Networks.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Transfusion Burden in Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical Necrotising Enterocolitis (S-NEC): Where We Stand Today: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: Recent evidence suggests a restrictive approach toward blood transfusions for management of preterm infants. Objective was to survey blood transfusion practises in preterm neonates <29 weeks' gestation among 12 population-based neonatal networks participating in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes in Neonates (iNeo).
methodsAn online survey based on 2023 practices was sent to 608 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs): Australia/New Zealand (30), Brazil (20), Canada (32), Finland (5), France (70), Israel (26), Japan (292), Poland (56), Spain (55), Sweden (9), Switzerland (9), and Tuscany, Italy (4). Transfusion thresholds in 4 different scenarios were surveyed: (a) infants invasively ventilated within first 7 postnatal days, (b) infants invasively ventilated after 7 days, (c) stable infants on noninvasive respiratory support, and (d) stable infants requiring no respiratory support.
resultsA total of 382 NICUs (63%) responded. Transfusion practices varied within networks and between countries. For invasively ventilated infants, the transfusion threshold during first 7 days after birth was a hematocrit <underline>≤</underline>35% in 79% of NICUs, and at an age ≥8 days, the transfusion threshold was a hematocrit <underline>≤</underline>30% in 68% of NICUs. For stable infants on noninvasive ventilation, the transfusion threshold was a hematocrit <underline>≤</underline>30% in 80%, and in those without respiratory support, the transfusion threshold was a hematocrit of <underline>≤</underline>25% in 68% of NICUs.
conclusionsVariations exist in blood transfusion practises between countries and within networks. A restrictive transfusion approach based on recent recommendations has been adopted by more than two-thirds of NICUs. Additional research is needed to evaluate whether practices align with intentions and how they impact outcomes. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.