ArticleInternational archives of allergy and immunology2026
Inhalant Allergen Sensitization: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Geographic Variation in the USA.
Article in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Patterns of Allergen Sensitization in Southern China: A Retrospective Analysis of 18,777 Routine Checkup Participants in Shenzhen.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p>Introduction: We aimed to assess the prevalence of IgE-mediated sensitization to two perennial (dust mite and animal) and four seasonal allergen sources (tree, grass, weed, and mold/fungi) using data from a national clinical reference laboratory (Quest Diagnostics).
methodsPatients tested in 2019 for ≥1 specific serum IgE toward 4 dust mites, 14 animals, 32 trees, 12 grasses, 21 weeds, or 19 mold/fungi allergens were included. Patients with ≥1 specific IgE ≥0.10 kU/L within a source were considered sensitized for the source. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare the estimated prevalence of allergic sensitization related to demographics, geography, and clinical diagnosis.
resultsSensitization for dust mite, animal, tree, grass, weed, and mold/fungi sources was 38.0% (21,161/55,735), 32.1% (21,888/68,035), 34.5% (22,975/66,567), 30.3% (21,664/71,575), 31.2% (22,960/73,605), and 19.7% (13,514/68,574), respectively. Across allergen sources, males had higher prevalence (from lowest to highest: 25.3% mold/fungi to 43.0% dust mite) compared to females (from lowest to highest: 16.1% mold/fungi to 34.6% dust mite); prevalence peaked in 10-19 years (from lowest to highest: 29.7% mold/fungi to 54.2% dust mite) and then decreased with increasing age; large metropolitan areas (from lowest to highest: 39.6% dust mite to 20.7% mold/fungi) had higher prevalence compared to small-to-medium metro (from lowest to highest: 36.6% dust mite to 17.9% mold/fungi) or nonmetro areas (from lowest to highest: 32.4% dust mite to 19.5% mold/fungi); a higher prevalence was observed in patients with asthma, atopic dermatitis, or rhinitis than in those with none of these diagnoses reported. Sensitization to perennial and seasonal allergens showed regional variation.
conclusionsPrevalence of allergic sensitization to perennial and seasonal allergens is associated with patient age and sex, census regions, level of urbanization, and allergic disease states. These factors should be considered when designing and selecting allergen panels for diagnosing and treating symptomatic patients. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.