ArticleHearing research2025
Visualization of relative cochlear motions using high resolution optical coherence microscopy.
Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite enormous progress in understanding the electro-mechanical properties of outer hair cells and the molecular basis of these properties, less is known about the relative motion of the organ of Corti and accessory structures that shape cochlear responses to acoustic stimulation. Here, we characterize absolute and relative motions of apical regions of the excised gerbil cochleae using a custom Doppler optical coherence microscopy (DOCM) system. Responses to sinusoidal stimuli show nanometer-scale motions of the tectorial membrane (TM), organ of Corti structures (e.g. outer hair cells, pillar cells), and basilar membrane in the apical turn of the cochlea. Motion-magnified analysis reveals rotations about the inner pillar cells at nearly constant phase, whereas TM motion lags that of the underlying cells by as much as 0.1 radians. Our DOCM results demonstrate a new technique capable of concurrent high resolution anatomical imaging and nanometer-scale motion analysis of cellular and acellular structures in response to stapes stimulation, enabling investigations of relative cochlear motions and feedback mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.