ArticleMelanoma management2025
Case report of LVEF derived from gated FDG-PET: potential to streamline cardiotoxic surveillance in melanoma patients.
Article in Melanoma management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in cancer therapy have improved patient outcomes, but cardiotoxicity remains a significant risk. In melanoma patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, monitoring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during treatment is recommended to detect cardiac dysfunction. Despite the widespread use of FDG-PET in oncology, its potential for concurrent cardiac assessment remains underexplored.
methodsA 42-year-old male undergoing treatment for disseminated melanoma underwent measurements of LVEF using four modalities: 3D-MUGA, 3D echocardiography, Rb-PET, and gated FDG-PET.
resultsLVEF was within the normal range across all modalities: 60% (3D-MUGA), 61% (3D echocardiography), 63% (Rb-PET), and 65% (FDG-PET).
conclusionThis case presents an estimation of LVEF derived from a clinically indicated, FDG-PET scan, performed alongside three conventional modalities on the same day. This approach may be particularly useful in melanoma patients who undergo frequent FDG-PET scans. While the findings are promising, broader validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.