Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435368›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

RETINA: Reconstruction-based pre-trained enhanced TransUNet for electron microscopy segmentation on the CEM500K dataset.

Cheng Xing, Ronald Xie, Gary D Bader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cheng XingDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7959-6403
Ronald XieDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gary D BaderDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0185-8861

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy (EM) has revolutionized our understanding of cellular structures at the nanoscale. Accurate image segmentation is required for analyzing EM images. While manual segmentation is reliable, it is labor-intensive, incentivizing the development of automated segmentation methods. Although deep learning-based segmentation has demonstrated expert-level performance, it lacks generalizable performance across diverse EM datasets. Current approaches usually use either convolutional or transformer-based neural networks for image feature extraction. We developed the RETINA method, which combines pre-training on the large, unlabeled CEM500K EM image dataset with a hybrid neural-network model architecture that integrates both local (convolutional layer) and global (transformer layer) image processing to learn from manual image annotations. RETINA outperformed existing models on cellular structure segmentation on five public EM datasets. This improvement works toward automated cellular structure segmentation for the EM community.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ElectronRetinaAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40435368
PMCPMC12143494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.