ArticlePloS one2025
A surgical recovery matrix to evaluate post-surgical recovery in mice using sham and myocardial infarction models of cardiac surgery as prototypes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Examinations of biomarkers are useful in measuring overall health. Endpoints are critical to assess the threshold where the scientific aim of the study does not prevail over the wellbeing of experimental laboratory animal. However, parameters able to assess health and recovery after an acute post-surgical intervention are needed. To fill this gap, we combined a suite of qualitative and quantitative measurements and created a surgical recovery matrix (SRM) able to monitor and score rodent health and wellbeing after surgery. We established baseline values in healthy male and female retired breeder C57BL/6N mice as a control, no surgery (NoSx) cohort. To test if SRM scoring was useful in the immediate surgical period, we monitored changes in 18 parameters after sham (SH) and myocardial infarction (MI)-inducing surgeries over 3 days of recovery. The surgical manipulations and cardiac damage involved in MI-inducing surgery render its categorization as a major surgery. In contrast, SH surgery represents a minor surgery such that the surgical manipulations are identical to that of the MI surgery but without any manipulation/damage to the heart. Six hours after surgery, males and females showed deficits in nestlet integration, eye grooming, a hunched posture and rough coat appearance whereas greater body weight losses and impaired wound healing were recorded later in the observation period. Sex-specific differences were observed such that males showed a propensity to reduced mobility and lower surface body temperature whereas females had a reduced Body Condition Score. These parameters discriminated the very low scores detected in controls from the intermediate scores after SH surgery and the highest scores in mice severely debilitated by MI surgery. Further, we identified sex-specific and time-dependent changes such that the highest scores were detected in male mice after an MI versus SH surgery. We conclude that a combination of quantitative and qualitative parameters successfully evaluated mouse recovery and health after minor and major surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.