Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435333›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Advancing malware imagery classification with explainable deep learning: A state-of-the-art approach using SHAP, LIME and Grad-CAM.

Sadia Nazim, Muhammad Mansoor Alam, Syed Safdar Rizvi, Jawahir Che Mustapha, Syed Shujaa Hussain, Mazliham Mohd Suud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sadia NazimMalaysian Institute of Information Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-9760
Muhammad Mansoor AlamFaculty of Computing, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syed Safdar RizviDepartment of Computer Science, Bahria University Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.
Jawahir Che MustaphaMalaysian Institute of Information Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-6797
Syed Shujaa HussainDepartment of Computer Science, Sir Syed CASE Institute of Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mazliham Mohd SuudMultimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being integrated into increasingly more domains of everyday activities. Whereas AI has countless benefits, its convoluted and sometimes vague internal operations can establish difficulties. Nowadays, AI is significantly employed for evaluations in cybersecurity that find it challenging to justify their proceedings; this absence of accountability is alarming. Additionally, over the last ten years, the fractional elevation in malware variants has directed scholars to utilize Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches for detection. Although these methods yield exceptional accuracy, they are also difficult to understand. Thus, the advancement of interpretable and powerful AI models is indispensable to their reliability and trustworthiness. The trust of users in the models used for cybersecurity would be undermined by the ambiguous and indefinable nature of existing AI-based methods, specifically in light of the more complicated and diverse nature of cyberattacks in modern times. The present research addresses the comparative analysis of an ensemble deep neural network (DNNW) with different ensemble techniques like RUSBoost, Random Forest, Subspace, AdaBoost, and BagTree for the best prediction against imagery malware data. It determines the best-performing model, an ensemble DNNW, for which explainability is provided. There has been relatively little study on explainability, especially when dealing with malware imagery data, irrespective of the fact that DL/ML algorithms have revolutionized malware detection. Explainability techniques such as SHAP, LIME, and Grad-CAM approaches are employed to present a complete comprehension of feature significance and local or global predictive behavior of the model over various malware categories. A comprehensive investigation of significant characteristics and their impact on the decision-making process of the model and multiple query point visualizations are some of the contributions. This strategy promotes advanced transparency and trustworthy cybersecurity applications by improving the comprehension of malware detection techniques and integrating explainable AI observations with domain-specific knowledge.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityDeep LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40435333
PMCPMC12118971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.