Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Barriers and facilitators of advance care planning practices in multi-disciplinary, multi-facility palliative care for Japan's aging population: A qualitative analysis.

Mariko Tanimoto, Norihiro Okamura, Kaku Sawada, Tomofumi Igarashi, Mitsunori Nishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariko TanimotoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Healthcare, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-8816
Norihiro OkamuraMedical Social Worker, Keiwakai Nishioka Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kaku SawadaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Keiwakai Nishioka Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tomofumi IgarashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Keiwakai Nishioka Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Mitsunori NishikawaDepartment of Palliative Care, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-808X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, multi-disciplinary advance care planning (ACP) in multi-facility settings for aging communities is essential; however, it does not consistently yield the desired outcomes. Japan's population is rapidly aging; nonetheless, no studies have examined comprehensive ACP implementation by diverse professionals across various community healthcare facilities. Within the context of an aging community, this study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation by multiple professionals in various healthcare facilities. A qualitative research design was employed. The study participants included 22 multidisciplinary members of a community-based palliative care (CBPC) team. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between September and October 2019. A total of 19 barriers and 19 facilitators were identified and categorized into seven practice domains: "Understanding patients' intentions," "Family support," "Information sharing using tools," "Collaboration among multiple professions," "Cross-facility and cross-departmental cooperation," "Raising awareness in the community," and "Efforts by implementation promoters and their departments." Barriers included "Inability to understand the patient's intentions," "Physical and psychological distance between patient and family," and "Different information needs and sharing methods at each facility," among others. Facilitators included "Skills for better understanding the true meaning of patients' intentions," "Compatibility of daily tasks and ACP by utilizing tools," "Human connections between professionals in multiple facilities and departments," and "Engagement with ACP implementation," among others. The study identified important domains for practical ACP implementation using a community-based palliative care team collaborating across multiple community facilities, as well as the barriers and facilitators. The findings indicate that multi-disciplinary, multi-facility ACP implementation in regions with aging populations requires establishing a regional collaborative network system and a human network. Healthcare professionals must develop practical ACP experience to identify its benefits while enhancing their skills as "advocates."

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgingPalliative CareAgedFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40435225
PMCPMC12118854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.