ArticlePloS one2025
Telemedicine via data glasses in CBRN protection suit-Evaluation of medical qualification and technical feasibility.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Crowd to Care: Telemedical Delegation in Mass Gathering Medicine and Its Projected Impact on Hospital Transport-A Modified Delphi Study with Retrospective Modelling.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Correction: Telemedicine via data glasses in CBRN protection suit-Evaluation of medical qualification and technical feasibility.PloS one · 2026Article
- Emergency Medical Service Responses for Older Adults: A Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Nursing Homes and the Community.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of emergency medical responses to nursing homes in a local area of Germany.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTelemedicine in the context of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats (CBRN) must adapt to the special features of the CBRN protection suit (hazmat suit). In a simulation, telemedicine with data glasses (smart glasses) was examined for its technical feasibility and the minimum required medical qualification. METHODOLOGY: The study was designed as an intervention study. A medical scenario was developed in which paramedics with four different medical qualifications were to provide initial care to a contaminated patient. Using data glasses worn in the CBRN protection suit, a telemedicine physician directed the simulation via video streaming. The times and attempts for each measure were examined, as well as the users' evaluation of two different data glasses.
resultsA total of 40 participants were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences could be found between participants of the next higher qualifications in terms of the duration of the guided measures and the success. Significant differences only occurred when comparing all evaluated qualifications to each other. Both data glasses have difficulties in the CBRN protection suit. The participants were not satisfied with the wearing comfort and the technical limitations of the glasses. SUMMARY: In conclusion, telemedicine is feasible for emergency responders regardless of qualification in CBRN operations, although the data glasses currently appear unsuitable. Alternative hardware should be used and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.