SynthesisPloS one2025
Effect of biologic treatments on growth in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Evolution of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Narrative Review and 15-Year Follow-Up Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stress-induced IL-6 regulation in pediatric bone growth disorders: current insights and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) often experience growth retardation due to various factors. The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the management of aggressive forms of JIA. This systematic review aims to provide updated insights into the impact of biologic treatments on growth retardation in pediatric JIA patients. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles. Included were cohort studies, trials, and retrospective studies that evaluated growth outcomes in children with JIA receiving biologic therapy. Twelve studies published between 2003 and 2018 were analyzed, encompassing 1513 patients with a mean age of 11.4 years. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors were the predominant biologic agents used (75.8%), with a mean follow-up duration of 2 years post-biologic therapy initiation. Growth assessment criteria included Height Standard-deviation-score (HSDS), growth velocity, and height velocity (cm/year). Before biologic treatment, 15% of patients exhibited growth delay, while 75.4% had impaired growth. Following biologic therapy, growth delay decreased to 8% and impaired growth to 36.8%. Patients with systemic JIA showed lower changes in growth parameters compared to others, and no significant differences were observed between different biologic drugs. However, lower growth velocity changes were noted in patients treated with multiple biologic agents. Two studies suggested that growth catch-up was most pronounced during the first year of treatment. This systematic review highlights the potential of biologic therapies in mitigating growth impairment associated with JIA. Despite observed positive effects, further research is warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.