Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Odor classification: Exploring feature performance and imbalanced data learning techniques.

Durgesh Ameta, Surendra Kumar, Rishav Mishra, Laxmidhar Behera, Aniruddha Chakraborty, Tushar Sandhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Durgesh AmetaIndian Knowledge System and Mental Health Applications Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6461-5519
Surendra KumarSchool of Electronics, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Una, India.
Rishav MishraSchool of Electronics, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Una, India.
Laxmidhar BeheraIndian Knowledge System and Mental Health Applications Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, India.
Aniruddha ChakrabortySchool of Basic Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Mandi, India.
Tushar SandhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research delves into olfaction, a sensory modality that remains complex and inadequately understood. We aim to fill in two gaps in recent studies that attempted to use machine learning and deep learning approaches to predict human smell perception. The first one is that molecules are usually represented with molecular fingerprints, mass spectra, and vibrational spectra; however, the influence of the selected representation method on predictive performance is inadequately documented in direct comparative studies. To fill this gap, we assembled a large novel dataset of 2606 molecules with three kinds of features: mass spectra (MS), vibrational spectra (VS) and molecular fingerprint features (FP). We evaluated their performance using four different multi-label classification models. The second objective is to address an inherent challenge in odor classification multi-label datasets (MLD)-the issue of class imbalance by random resampling techniques and an explainable, cost-sensitive multilayer perceptron model (CSMLP). Experimental results suggest significantly better performance of the molecular fingerprint-based features compared with mass and vibrational spectra with the micro-averaged F1 evaluation metric. The proposed resampling techniques and cost-sensitive model outperform the results of previous studies. We also report the predictive performance of multimodal features obtained by fusing the three mentioned features. This comprehensive and systematic study compares the predictive performance for odor classification of different features and utilises a multifaceted approach to deal with data imbalance. Our explainable model sheds further light on features and odour relations. The results hold the potential to guide the development of the electric nose and our dataset will be made publicly available.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOdorantsSmellHumansMass SpectrometryOlfactory Perception

Identifiers

PMID40435193
PMCPMC12118925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.