Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Investigating the impact of investor attention on AI-based stocks: A comprehensive analysis using quantile regression, GARCH, and ARIMA models.

Sweena Ravichandran, Mohd Afjal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sweena RavichandranVIT Business School, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3946-6375
Mohd AfjalVIT Business School, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-6055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature implies an increased interest in AI-based companies, but it is unclear how investor attention affects their volatility. This study fills the gap by investigating the relationship between investor attention, as measured by Google Trends data, and the volatility of AI-based stocks. Using weekly adjusted closing stock price data for 8 AI-based stocks from 2015 to 2024, quantile regression analysis was used to identify the impact of investor attention at various volatility levels. Though the direction of the effect differs, the data shows that investor attention has a considerable impact on the volatility of AI-based companies. Although most stocks show a positive relationship, Tencent Holding's unique traits or market dynamics impact its response to investor attention. The study uses GARCH and ARIMA models to investigate stock volatility dynamics across time. The findings of this study show that market information changes are critical in driving volatility variations. This study provides insights into the intricate relationship between investor attention and market volatility, with substantial implications for investors and policymakers. Understanding these processes can help investors make educated decisions and allocate resources more effectively, while regulators can devise policies to reduce possible risks and promote market stability.

Indexed as

InvestmentsModels, EconomicAttentionCommerceHumansRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40435172
PMCPMC12118928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.