Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435152›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

How health securitisation shapes health system priorities: A realist synthesis.

Delaram Akhavein, Meru Sheel, Seye Abimbola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Delaram AkhaveinFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6610-4677
Meru SheelFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-070X
Seye AbimbolaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-3850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health securitisation - i.e., framing health issues as security issues or as threats- is growing in contemporary global health discourse. Given the power disparity between the actors who can frame a health issue or on whose behalf issues are framed and the actors who may experience the consequences of such framing, it is crucial to understand how 'health security' framing impacts health system prioritisation. We conducted a realist synthesis on how ("mechanism") and under what conditions ("context") health securitisation impacts health system priorities ("outcome") at different levels of health governance. To capture contemporary analyses, we searched the SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health databases for articles published from 2010 to 2023. We included 51 articles in the realist synthesis: empirical studies and conceptual analyses on the effects of health securitisation (and associated security-oriented policies, practices and measures), even if implicitly, on health system priorities. Through the synthesis, we identified five mechanisms by which 'health security' framing is adopted in response to an event - 'uncertainty' (managing the ambiguity of risks), 'self-protection' (safeguarding own group/national interests), 'self-reliance' (projecting own ability to be autonomous), 'self-preservation' (preserving own institutional credibility), and 'norm-setting' (entrenching long-term policy shifts). We also identified contextual factors (e.g., similar past events, inequities between groups/nations, militarisation of governance, donor influence, geopolitical interests) that influence these mechanisms to generate outcomes in the form of priorities (e.g., mobilisation of funds, overemphasis on one disease or approach over others, abuse of power that disproportionately impact marginalised individuals, groups, and nations). Each mechanism is influenced by a set of contextual factors which are peculiar to a place and time. Understanding these links between context, mechanism, and outcome can allow for a closer examination and anticipation of 'health security' framing and its impact on prioritisation in different settings globally.

Identifiers

PMID40435152
PMCPMC12118837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.