ArticlePloS one2025
Innovative novel regularized memory graph attention capsule network for financial fraud detection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Financial fraud detection (FFD) is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficiency of financial transactions. This article presents the Regularised Memory Graph Attention Capsule Network (RMGACNet), an original architecture aiming at improving fraud detection using Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks combined with advanced feature extraction and classification algorithms. The model is tested on two reliable datasets: the European Cardholder (ECH) transactions dataset, which contains 284,807 transactions and 492 fraud instances, and the IEEE-CIS dataset, which has more than 1 million transactions. Our approach enhances comparison to existing methods of feature selection and classification accuracy. On the ECH dataset, RMGACNet achieves an accuracy of 0.9772, a precision of 0.9768, and an F1 score of 0.9770 measures; on the IEEE-CIS dataset, it achieves an accuracy of 0.9882, a precision of 0.9876 and an F1 score of 0.9879. The findings indicate that RMGACNet routinely surpasses existing models' efficiency and accuracy while ensuring strong execution time performance, especially when handling large-scale datasets. The suggested model demonstrates scalability and stability, making it suitable for real-time financial systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.