Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435122›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

The association of sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiahui Huang, Min Li, Qiangqiang Luo, Jing Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahui HuangSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6612-5604
Min LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiangqiang LuoSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jing LiSchool of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9533-637X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study aimed to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and cognitive impairment, and to analyze the impact of potential moderating factors.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Databases, VIP and SinoMed from inception until March 2025. The quality of cross-sectional studies was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale, while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of included case-control and cohort studies. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were employed to explore potential moderating variables and heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 31 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 27 studies were quantitatively analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that both sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia significantly associated with cognitive impairment (OR=1.88, 95%CI = 1.71-2.08), (OR=1.96, 95%CI = 1.50-2.58). Subgroup analyses revealed a stronger association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment in specific demographics: among females with sarcopenia (OR=3.22, 95%CI = 1.23-8.40), in Asian populations (OR=1.96, 95%CI = 1.76-2.18), and within hospital settings (OR=3.12, 95%CI = 2.18-4.48). These findings underscore the influence of gender, ethnicity, and healthcare environment on the relationship between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment. An assessment of publication bias within studies providing adjusted odds ratios indicated potential bias. However, sensitivity analyses and trim-and-filling analyses confirmed the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed associations remain reliable despite the presence of publication bias.

conclusionsIndividuals with sarcopenia or possible sarcopenia have approximately twice the odds of developing cognitive impairment compared to those without sarcopenia. Implementing systematic screening and targeted interventions for possible sarcopenia patients is essential to prevent from cognitive decline. Specifically, healthcare professionals should focus on women and inpatients with sarcopenia, employing proactive measures to avert cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionSarcopeniaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40435122
PMCPMC12118908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.