Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435118›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Ten simple rules for queer data collection and analysis by STEM researchers.

Dori M Grijseels, M Banqueri, Keerthana Iyer, Lee Hanlin, Melanie Ortiz Alvarez de la Campa, David Pagliaccio, Bittu K Rajaraman, Eitan Schechtman, ALBA Network Gender & Sexual Diversity Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dori M GrijseelsSocial Systems and Circuits Group, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3822-5323
M BanqueriCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Keerthana IyerALBA Network, Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-6781
Lee HanlinDepartment of Neurobiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Melanie Ortiz Alvarez de la CampaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-2938
David PagliaccioDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-1965
Bittu K RajaramanDepartment of Psychology, Ashoka University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-7015
Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8127-012X
ALBA Network Gender & Sexual Diversity Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Queer people are still underrepresented both as STEM researchers and participants, partially due to a dearth of accurate data on this demographic. The lack of consideration for queer identities in data collection and dissemination causes a vicious cycle of exclusion. To address this invisibility, it is important to collect and report data in an inclusive and accurate manner across all areas of research, including in studies that are not specifically focused on queer populations. However, STEM researchers are often unsure of how to properly collect data in a manner that fairly represents queer people. We have developed a list of Ten Simple rules to aid researchers to perform data collection on queer individuals, focusing on study design and data dissemination. We address several issues in queer data, such as language use, dealing with small populations, and balancing demands. We also discuss how to extend this inclusive practice for studies on animal populations. These rules are aimed at anybody surveying populations which may contain queer individuals, including for example research studies and inclusivity surveys for conferences. By providing practical tips, we hope to alleviate insecurity and confusion around this topic.

Indexed as

Data CollectionResearch PersonnelSexual and Gender MinoritiesAnimalsComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID40435118
PMCPMC12118915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.