Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435110›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2025

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection among blood donors from two Brazilian states in the post-vaccination period: a prospective cohort study.

Monike Aparecida Matos de Oliveira, Tiane Sena de Castro, Renata Buccheri, Tassila Salomon, Carla Luana Dinardo, Isabel Cristina Gomes Moura, Myuki Alfaia Esashika Crispim, Nelson Abrahim Fraiji, Ester Cerdeira Sabino, Cecília Salete Alencar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Monike Aparecida Matos de OliveiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6613-2693
Tiane Sena de CastroUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Renata BuccheriVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States.
Tassila SalomonFaculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-3118
Carla Luana DinardoFundação Pró-Sangue Hemocentro, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isabel Cristina Gomes MouraUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Myuki Alfaia Esashika CrispimFundação Hospitalar de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Nelson Abrahim FraijiFundação Hospitalar de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Ester Cerdeira SabinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-5126
Cecília Salete AlencarUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Medicina Laboratorial (LIM-03), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-2275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess SARS-CoV-2 reinfection incidence in the post-vaccination period, we carried out a prospective cohort study of blood donors from Amazonas and Sao Paulo States, Brazil. Anti-nucleocapsid immunoglobulin (IgG anti-N) tests carried out by blood centers in 2020 were used to identify previous SARS-CoV-2 infections in blood donors and divide them into two groups: prior infection (n=386) and no prior infection (n=111). From March 2021 to January 2022, donors were followed up for six months, during which IgG anti-N and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests were performed every two months to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections. Symptoms and vaccination status were also recorded. Most participants (93.6%) received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Reinfection incidence in the prior infection group equaled 1.39 per 100 person-months (95% CI: 0.90-2.06), in comparison to 2.68 per 100 person-months (95% CI: 1.28-4.93) for new infections in those without prior infection. The incidence risk ratio showed no significant association (0.52, 95% CI: 0.25-1.13). However, prior infection significantly increased the probability of remaining uninfected (Log-rank: p=0.009). Most reinfections (84%) showed no symptoms and occurred post-vaccination during the Delta and Omicron waves. IgG anti-N seroprevalence decreased in the prior infection group (from 35.5% at baseline to 22.5% after six months, p=0.003). Despite no significant incidence risk ratio differences, donors with prior infection had lower infection rates and a higher likelihood of remaining uninfected. Persistent post-vaccination asymptomatic infections emphasize the need for ongoing prevention, genomic surveillance, and booster programs to address emerging variants and protect vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesReinfectionSARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, ViralBrazilFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID40435110
PMCPMC12105851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.