ArticleCoDAS2025
Short-term effects of acoustically controlled auditory training in children with impaired school performance.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effectiveness of acoustically controlled auditory training (ACAT) and the maintenance of auditory skills acquired by children with impaired school performance.
methodsSample consisting of 20 schoolchildren: Control Group (CG - N=10) and Intervention Group (IG - N=10), aged from 8 to 13 years old, results below expectations in a school performance screening, adequate results in a cognitive screening and diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) after a battery of behavioral tests. The CG did not receive any type of intervention, only evaluation and reevaluation after three months. The IG was assessed immediately after eight ACAT sessions and three months post-intervention. Auditory processing assessment and reassessment data were subjected to statistical analysis (p<0.05).
resultsThe sample was considered homogeneous regarding gender, age, education level and academic performance. Regarding CAP assessment data, both groups were homogeneous (excepting the Synthetic Sentence Identification - SSI test). Children from IG improved their performance on the Dichotic Digit, Consonant Vowel, SSI and Frequency Pattern (FPT) tests immediately after the intervention. After three months of ACAT, these values remained the same or increased, except for FPT. In the qualitative analysis, between normal and altered, the IG maintained adequate results after three months of ACAT. In the CG, six children maintained altered results and four reached normality in the reassessment after three months.
conclusionACAT proved to be effective for rehabilitating the auditory skills of children with impaired school performance even three months after the end of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.