ReviewCritical care science2025
Home care after intensive care unit-discharge: global differences.
Review in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential strengths and limitations of the Better at Home Program identified by professionals and managers: a scoping review of the literature.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant physical and neuropsychiatric challenges, diminished life quality, and heightened demand for healthcare services often mark the period following discharge from the intensive care unit and hospitalization. Most follow-up care for these patients relies on clinic-based models, necessitating visits to healthcare facilities for rehabilitation and continued monitoring. However, this approach can create barriers for the most severely affected individuals, potentially worsening health inequities. In contrast, home care offers a viable solution by providing essential social support and assistance to patients with varying healthcare needs, allowing them to preserve their independence within the familiar environment of their own homes and communities. This model presents a promising alternative to the conventional clinic-based post-intensive care unit recovery system. It is cost-effective and better aligned with the preferences of an increasing number of individuals who choose to stay at home rather than move to institutional settings for care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.