Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40435028›Full record

ArticleCritical care science2025

Sedation practices in patients intubated in the emergency department compared with those in patients in the intensive care unit.

Jariya Sereeyotin, Christopher Yarnell, Sangeeta Mehta

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Post-intubation sedation in the emergency department: A scoping review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jariya SereeyotinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University - Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2880-8242
Christopher YarnellDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto - Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5657-9398
Sangeeta MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto - Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-4769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compare sedation management during and after intubation in the emergency department with that in the intensive care unit.

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults who were intubated in the emergency department or intensive care unit and who received mechanical ventilation between January 2018 and February 2022. We collected data from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the duration from intubation to the first documentation of light sedation, which was defined as a Sedation Agitation Scale score of 3 - 4.

resultsThis study included 264 patients, 95 (36%) of whom were intubated in the emergency department and 169 (64%) in the intensive care unit. With respect to the anesthetic agents used for intubation, ketamine was the most frequently used drug in the emergency department and was used more frequently than in the intensive care unit (61% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Propofol was the predominant sedative used in the intensive care unit, with a higher prevalence than in the emergency department (50% versus 33%; p = 0.01). Additionally, benzodiazepines and fentanyl were more frequently used in the intensive care unit (39% versus 6%; p < 0.001 and 68% versus 9.5%; p < 0.001, respectively). Within 24 hours after intubation, 68% (65/95) of the emergency department patients and 82% (138/169) of the patients intubated in the intensive care unit achieved light sedation, with median durations of 13.5 hours and 10.5 hours, respectively. Patients who were intubated in the emergency department were less likely to achieve light sedation at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; p = 0.04; 95%CI, 0.42 - 0.97).

conclusionCompared with intensive care unit patients, critically ill patients who were intubated in the emergency department are at risk of deeper sedation and a longer time to achieve light sedation.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsIntubation, IntratrachealProcedural SedationAdultAgedBenzodiazepinesFemaleFentanylHumansKetamineMaleMiddle AgedPropofolRespiration, ArtificialBenzodiazepinesFentanylHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofol

Identifiers

PMID40435028
PMCPMC12094695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.