Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025
Is Female Gender Associated with Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?
Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nothing about Women without Women is for Women.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) tend to have worse in-hospital outcomes, but it is unclear whether these differences are due to gender or to clinical factors.
objectiveTo compare in-hospital outcomes between women and men undergoing CABG.
methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective observational study analyzing data from 9,845 patients who underwent CABG between 1995 and 2022, of whom 1,947 (19.8%) were women. To evaluate female gender as a prognostic factor for in-hospital mortality, we used descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and propensity score matching. The significance level was set at 5%.
resultsWomen were older (66.7 vs 62.19 years, p<0.001), had lower body mass index (26.91 vs 27.64, p<0.001), and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (34.0% vs 31.6%, p=0.045). They also had longer hospital stays (14.84 vs 13.13 days, p<0.001) and higher operative mortality (4.8% vs 2.4%, p<0.001). In logistic regression, female gender was associated with higher mortality (OR=1.51; 95% CI: 1.15-1.99; p=0.003). After matching, there was no significant difference in mortality (OR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.88-1.64; p=0.241), but length of hospital stay remained longer in women.
conclusionWhen clinical factors were matched between men and women, the mortality difference disappeared. This suggests that targeted interventions to reduce disparities may help improve mortality outcomes in women undergoing CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.