Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434958›Full record

ReviewPlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2025

Dark side of anthocyanin pigmentation.

K Wolff, B Pucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K WolffPlant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Plant Biology & BRICS, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-0482
B PuckerPlant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Institute of Plant Biology & BRICS, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dark pigmentation can be observed in various parts of the plant, ranging from foliage to petals and berries. Here, we review the available knowledge about dark pigmentation in plants and the potential for biotechnological applications. The molecular basis of black pigmentation appears to vary among species, with anthocyanins playing a significant role, although specific anthocyanin types and their mechanisms differ. These findings suggest that the development of phenotypes is species-specific or varies between larger taxonomic groups; this is further supported by the polyphyletic nature of dark pigmentation. Additionally, several different regulatory mechanisms have been described for the occurrence of dark pigmentation. First, the repression or knockout of the competing flavone biosynthesis has been shown to lead to darker pigmentation while another mechanism is based on the activation and upregulation of the anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in the presence of MYB transcription factors. Potential ecological functions of dark pigmentation were identified as protection of the photosynthesis apparatus, camouflage against herbivores, and the attraction of pollinators. Promising industrial applications include microbial factories for the production of natural food colourants, induction of novel phenotypes for the ornamental plant industry and, lastly, increase of anthocyanins within agriculturally relevant crops. Understanding the genetic basis of dark pigment accumulation would facilitate biotechnological and agricultural applications.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsPigmentationPlantsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhenotypeAnthocyaninsAnthocyaninsflavonoidsflower colourpigmentationsecondary plant metabolitesspecialized plant metabolitesstress response

Identifiers

PMID40434958
PMCPMC12477305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.