ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025
Identification of Ethno-veterinary Practices for Animal Diseases in Assosa Zone, Benishangul-Gumuz Region.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indigenous Knowledge of Medicinal Plants for Treating Livestock Ailments in Megale District, Afar Region, Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Ethno-veterinary medicine is the use of traditional knowledge, theory, and skill to mitigate animal diseases. The study was conducted to document veterinary use of medicinal herbs in Assosa Zone, Ethiopia, from September 2022 to July 2023. Data collected from individual based field interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. Most of the respondents were males in the age group of 40 to 60 years old. By educational status, most of the respondents were illiterate and Muslims by religion. Around 68.6% of respondents acquire their traditional knowledge from family, and most respondents prepared remedies from plants 73 (71.6%). In this investigation, 71 plant species from five districts were identified. Those plants were used against 68 types of animal diseases. Those plants were distributed across 43 families. Data from this study revealed that the large number of plant species found in the Solanaceae and Fabaceae families is followed by Combretaceae and Asteraceae. Most respondents explained that the medicinal plants were found from the forest (42.25%), followed by both backyard and forest (35.21%) and only backyard (21.13%). Majorities of respondents explained that the root part of the medicinal plant is used for medicinal value (25.35%), followed by leaf and seed (22.54%) and bark (8.45%). The study revealed that the local healers in the districts have been heavily dependent on traditional animal health care for the treatment of a variety of animal diseases. Thus, it should recommend that medicinal plants used for the treatment of diseases should be tested on phytochemical screening, antioxidant activity and antimicrobial effects. In addition, conservation activities for medicinal plants and governmental encouragement of traditional healers should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.