Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Immunoadsorption as a novel therapy for refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autoantibody internalization in myositis skeletal muscle: Emerging evidence, mechanistic insights, and therapeutic relevance.Autoimmunity reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIdiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are autoimmune disorders characterised by muscle inflammation, high creatine kinase (CK) levels and disability. Despite immunomodulating therapies, patients often experience progressive disease, resulting in refractory conditions or dependence on glucocorticoids (GC). This study addresses the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption (IAS) in refractory IIM.
methodsA retrospective, monocentric study was conducted on patients with highly active IIM subjected to IAS between January 2000 and September 2021. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with confirmed IIM unresponsive to standard therapies, including GC and at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Primary end point was defined as minor improvement, requiring a ≥ 20% reduction in both daily GC dosage and CK levels at week 12, alongside patient comparative self-assessment (PCSA) rated as 'no change' or 'better'. Secondary endpoints included moderate (≥40%) and major (≥60%) improvements at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Relapse rates were assessed over a 3-month period following the last IAS procedure.
resultsThe study included 23 refractory IIM patients treated with IAS. Primary end point was reached by 52.2% (n = 12) patients. Moderate improvement was observed in 8.7% (n = 2), 26.1% (n = 6) and 34.8% (n = 8) and major improvement in 8.7% (n = 2), 17.4% (n = 4) and 30.4% (n = 7) at weeks 4, 8 and 12, respectively. No unexpected adverse events were reported, with low relapse rates within 3 months post-IAS (18%).
conclusionIAS may be an effective adjunctive therapy in patients refractory to GC and conventional treatments, leading to rapid CK level reductions, decreased GC usage and improvements in PCSA and muscle function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.