ArticleJAMA network open2025
Early-Life Low Lead Levels and Academic Achievement in Childhood and Adolescence.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Impact of federal housing assistance on children's blood Lead Levels, NHANES 1999-2016.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Adapting, piloting, and evaluating a pediatric lead screening and risk-reduction intervention in Nairobi: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial protocol.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lowered the blood lead reference values to 3.5 μg/dL or higher. More evidence is needed on the association between lead changes below 3.5 μg/dL and academic achievement. Objective: To examine the association of a 1-unit change in early childhood blood lead levels below 3.5 μg/dL vs at 3.5 μg/dL or higher with academic achievement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study linked birth certificates of children born in Iowa from 1989 to 2010 to their math and reading test scores for grades 2 through 11 and to their early childhood blood lead testing data. Analyses were completed between May 2024 and March 2025. Exposures: Early life blood lead levels below 3.5 μg/dL and at 3.5 μg/dL or higher. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was national percentile rank (NPR) scores on math and reading school tests. Regression models estimated the association between lead levels and math and reading scores, controlling for sociodemographic, child and maternal health, and school characteristics. Results: The analytical sample included up to 305 256 children and 1 782 873 child-grade observations. Within the analytical sample, 51.0% were male, 41.1% were first-born children, and 43.9% were born to mothers with an educational level of high school or less. Sociodemographic and child and maternal health characteristics were similar between the analytical sample and the birth population. The mean (SD) child age at lead testing was 1.9 (1.5) years. Among these children, 37.7% had lead values below 3.5 μg/dL. A 1-unit increase in lead levels below 3.5 μg/dL was associated with lower NPR scores in math by -0.47 (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.30) and in reading by -0.38 (95% CI, -0.56 to -0.20). For lead levels at 3.5 μg/dL or higher, a 1-unit increase in lead levels was associated with lower NPR scores in math by -0.52 (95% CI, -0.58 to -0.47) and in reading by -0.56 (95% CI, -0.62 to -0.51). These score declines were persistent across grades 2 through 11. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study assessing early life low lead level and children's and adolescents' academic achievement, a 1-unit increase in lead levels in the range currently considered low for further interventions was associated with worse academic performance throughout school grades comparable to that for lead levels in the range recommended for additional interventions. These findings support the need to reconsider and potentially lower current blood lead reference values for recommending further interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.