ArticleUrology research & practice2025
Uncovering New Horizons: Update to Quadruple-D Score to Predict Stone-Free Rate with Advanced Non-invasive Lithotripsy Technology.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the Quadruple-D scoring system in predicting stone-free rate (SFR) using the newer Generation Piezoelectric lithotripter. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January to December 2023, involving patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave litho- tripsy (ESWL) for renal stones sized 5-20 mm. Evaluation parameters included stone density, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), stone size (ellipsoid stone volume), and location, with Quadruple-D scores calculated based on predetermined cutoffs. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions utilized the "Piezolith 3000 Plus" lithotripter, and SFR was assessed 4 weeks post-procedure. Statistical analysis included Student's t-test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Of the 40 eligible patients, 75% achieved stone-free status post-ESWL. Stone density and SSD emerged as leading predictors of SFR, with new cut-off values identi- fied. Comparative analysis demonstrated improved predictive power of the Piezolith Q-D score over the previous Quadruple-D score (AUC: 84% and 80% respectively). Although stone location and size also influenced outcomes, their significance varied in this study. Conclusion: The Piezolith Q-D score system exhibits promise in predicting SFR post- ESWL with piezoelectric lithotripters. External validation and larger-scale studies are warranted to establish the scoring system's reliability and applicability across diverse populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.