Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434719›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Staging and treatment response assessment with radiological and nuclear medicine approaches for non-Hodgkin lymphomas].

Christian Neelsen, Ahmad Mohammad, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Christos Sachpekidis

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian NeelsenDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Ahmad MohammadDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDivision of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-StraussKlinische Kooperationseinheit Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, 69210, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Christos SachpekidisKlinische Kooperationseinheit Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld, 69210, Heidelberg, Deutschland. c.sachpekidis@dkfz-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueNon-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) represent a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases in which the choice of imaging modality and response criteria strongly depends on histology and clinical context. Selecting the appropriate method is essential for individualized treatment planning. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsAccording to the Lugano classification, METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: This article discusses the new classification systems Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria (LYRIC) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma (RECIL), as well as specific features of certain lymphoma subtypes and novel imaging approaches such as whole-body MRI and innovative PET tracers. PERFORMANCE: This narrative review does not include a systematic evaluation of sensitivity or specificity data. ACHIEVEMENTS: In PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Imaging is essential for tailored therapy planning and monitoring in NHL. As most NHL subtypes are

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Non-HodgkinPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm StagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsComputed tomographyDiffuse large B‑cell lymphomaPositron emission tomographyResponse assessmentResponse Evaluation Criteria in Lymphoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.