Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434676›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Management of Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Beyond CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Philip D Tracy, Emily Bopp, Emily Milner, Ana C Garrido-Castro, Antonio Giordano, Erica L Mayer, Sara M Tolaney, Paolo Tarantino, Ilana Schlam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philip D TracyDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Emily BoppDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Emily MilnerDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Ana C Garrido-CastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Antonio GiordanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Erica L MayerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3020-8123
Paolo TarantinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. paolo_tarantino@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-0228
Ilana SchlamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-0400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSince the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as the first-line treatment for metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer, there has been a significant expansion in the number of therapeutic options for subsequent lines of therapy. Many new agents are being studied, with potential for future regulatory approval. The increased number of therapeutic options raises questions about the optimal selection and sequencing of therapies for individual patients. These advances represent an important clinical challenge in this rapidly evolving field, given the introduction of new therapies targeting various pathways (alone or in combination) and new therapeutic classes being studied. RECENT

findingsRecently approved targeted therapies have demonstrated improvements in progression free survival (PFS) for patients whose cancer harbors mutations in the PI3K/AKT pathway, ESR1, BRCA1/2, and/or PALB2. Data to support continuation of CDK4/6 inhibition after progression on a prior CDK4/6i remains mixed, though some studies suggest a subset of patients may benefit from this approach. Several agents with unique mechanisms of action have shown promise in data from early phase trials, and have the potential to enter the treatment lexicon in the coming years. Examples include CDK2- and CDK4-selective inhibitors, complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs), proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), and next-generation PI3K pathway inhibitors. In this narrative review, we summarize the current and upcoming treatments for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer after progression on a CDK4/6i plus ET, with a focus on the following: an overview of first-line regimens of CDK4/6i plus ET and observed mechanisms of resistance; currently approved second-line therapy options; and upcoming options currently under exploration in clinical trials. We focus primarily on new therapy classes that may offer therapeutic options beyond currently available treatments.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCDK4/6 inhibitorHormone receptor-positiveMetastatic breast cancerPIK3CA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.