Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434672›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2025

Histological Evidence of the Great Obstetrical Syndromes and Short-Term Neonatal Outcomes.

Dan Lv, Xu-Fang Li, Shi-Yao Chen, Praseth Leakana, Jia-Qi Han, Jun-Rong Xian, Fan-Fan Li, Meng-Zhou He, Yao Fan, He-Ze Xu and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dan Lv *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xu-Fang Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Shi-Yao ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Praseth LeakanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Jia-Qi HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Jun-Rong XianTongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Fan-Fan LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Meng-Zhou HeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yao FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
He-Ze XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110000, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xing-Guang LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Fang YeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. yefang@hust.edu.cn.
Dong-Rui DengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. tjdengdongrui@126.com.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2017KFYXJJ102Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2019KFYXKJC053National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873843National Science and Technology Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period 2014BAI05B05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGreat obstetrical syndrome (GOS) represents a group of pregnancy-related diseases that result in inadequate placentation. Most GOS cases end in preterm, either spontaneously or indicatively, and the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) is inevitably discussed. The placenta is an important, transient fetal-derived organ and is the embodiment of maternal or fetal well-being. However, few studies provide histological evidence of the placenta in GOS. This study aims to address these issues.

methodsA total of 831 pregnant women were prospectively recruited. Placenta tissue was collected immediately and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution for future H&E analysis. A novel checklist was devised to evaluate maternal vascular malperfusion sections on the basis of the commonly accepted Amsterdam placental workshop group consensus statement.

resultsA total of 131 patients were classified as having GOS. Comparisons between those with and without GOS revealed significant differences, including higher levels of distal villous hypoplasia, increased syncytial knots, accelerated villous maturation, and higher total scores in GOS. We found significant negative associations between GOS and neonatal weight, neonatal height, head circumference, placental surface area, placental volume, and placenta gross examination score. GOS neonates were 1.25 times more likely to have hyperbilirubinemia. Regarding the effect of ACS, a significant reduction in birthweight, height, and head circumference was observed, along with an increased risk of hyperbilirubinemia.

conclusionThis study provides histological evidence of the GOS that supports the defective deep placentation hypothesis. Our research also contributes to benefit-risk consultation in the GOS, such as in cases of PE and FGR, where a balance between fetal lung maturation and short-term neonatal outcomes is crucial.

Indexed as

PlacentaPlacenta DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentationPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesAntenatal corticosteroidsGreat obstetrical syndromeMaternal vascular malperfusionNeonatal outcomes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.