ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
An automatic approach for the classification of lumpy skin disease in cattle.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) presents significant risks and economic challenges to global cattle farming. Effective and accurate classification of LSD is essential for managing the disease and reducing its impacts. Manual diagnosis is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and requires experienced personnel. Automated classification methods provide advantages by reducing labor and improving accuracy. This study proposes an automated algorithm for LSD classification using machine learning. The method uses a carefully curated dataset of images from both LSD-infected cattle and healthy cattle. Inception V3 was employed to extract features from complex lesion patterns in infected cattle images, comparing them to healthy cattle images. Support Vector Machines (SVM) were used to classify the extracted features. The results show the model achieved an 84% accuracy rate, with precision at 80%, recall at 83%, and an F1 score of 82%. These results were compared with other machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and AdaBoost. SVM outperformed other models, demonstrating consistent evaluation precision at 0.84. For further enhancement, expanding the dataset with high-quality images and applying advanced machine learning algorithms like Vision Transformers (ViTs), MobileNetV2, and Visual Geometry Group (VGG) could refine automated LSD classification. The aim is to improve disease management practices in the livestock industry through better classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40434587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.