ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Patient outcomes and surgical strategies in revision cervical arthroplasty following M6-C™ disc-related osteolysis.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeriprosthetic osteolysis from the M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc (Orthofix, Lewisville, Texas) has become a significant issue, sometimes requiring revision spine surgery (RSS). This study evaluates patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and revision strategies for managing device-related wear and osteolysis.
methodsPROMs, including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck/arm pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), were analyzed at pre-index surgery (T1), pre-RSS (T2), and final follow-up (T3). Osteolysis severity was graded radiographically. A control group who underwent primary M6-C cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) without RSS was included for comparison.
resultsOf 53 patients with M6-C CTDR, 19 (35.9%) required RSS due to osteolysis. Osteolysis grades included Grade 1 (4 patients), Grade 2 (7 patients), Grade 3 (3 patients), and Grade 4 (5 patients). Revision strategies included removal and anterior fusion, requiring vertebrectomy for Grade 4 cases; revisions to a different CTDR prosthesis were reserved for Grades 1-3. The RSS group showed significant VAS neck pain improvement at T3 (mean = 36.2 points, p < 0.001), exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). However, VAS arm pain and NDI did not meet MCID thresholds. The control group showed clinically significant improvements across all PROMs. At T2, the RSS group had a higher disability (NDI, p = 0.027) than the controls.
conclusionRevision surgery for M6-C osteolysis improves neck pain, not arm pain or disability. Early detection and tailored revision strategies are crucial to optimize patient outcomes and mitigate osteolysis-related disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40434584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.