ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
Identifying communities where older adults with major cancer diagnoses are contending with high levels of natural hazards.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to identify geographical areas of vulnerability, namely co-occurring heightened cancer prevalence and exposure to natural hazards.
methodsCancer prevalence data for four major cancers (lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used along with National Risk Index (NRI) for 18 hazards, including hurricane and wildfire, from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. We examined county-level spatial correlations between cancer prevalence and NRI values using Lee's L statistics.
resultsNRI values and cancer prevalence were positively correlated with substantial variations (global Lee's L = 0.24, p < 0.05; local Lee's L IQR -0.07 to 0.38). Out of 3106 counties in the contiguous United States, 455 (14.6%) had statistically significant spatial correlations between NRI values and cancer prevalence, of which 194 (43%) were hotspot counties with high NRI values correlated with high cancer prevalence. These hotspot counties were located mostly along coastlines, specifically the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico with some pockets in the Midwest, primarily in urban areas (151, 77.8%), and within the catchment areas of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (173, 89.2%). They also differed in the types of natural hazard and cancer, as well as community resilience and social vulnerability.
conclusionsWe identified several geographical areas in the United States with increased need, which may serve as priority areas for future research around the impacts of environmental exposures on cancer continuum. On a public health level, they also may guide prioritization efforts for environmental hazard planning and preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40434568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.