Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434568›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025

Identifying communities where older adults with major cancer diagnoses are contending with high levels of natural hazards.

Bian Liu, Perry Sheffield, Nihal Mohamed, Furrina Lee, Kayleen Bailey, Tabassum Insaf, Hannah Thompson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bian LiuDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY, 10029, USA. bian.liu@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-693X
Perry SheffieldDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9156-1193
Nihal MohamedDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Furrina LeeBureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-5124
Kayleen BaileyPediatric Hematology-Oncology, Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8193-642X
Tabassum InsafBureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4725-2515
Hannah ThompsonDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to identify geographical areas of vulnerability, namely co-occurring heightened cancer prevalence and exposure to natural hazards.

methodsCancer prevalence data for four major cancers (lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used along with National Risk Index (NRI) for 18 hazards, including hurricane and wildfire, from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. We examined county-level spatial correlations between cancer prevalence and NRI values using Lee's L statistics.

resultsNRI values and cancer prevalence were positively correlated with substantial variations (global Lee's L = 0.24, p < 0.05; local Lee's L IQR -0.07 to 0.38). Out of 3106 counties in the contiguous United States, 455 (14.6%) had statistically significant spatial correlations between NRI values and cancer prevalence, of which 194 (43%) were hotspot counties with high NRI values correlated with high cancer prevalence. These hotspot counties were located mostly along coastlines, specifically the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico with some pockets in the Midwest, primarily in urban areas (151, 77.8%), and within the catchment areas of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (173, 89.2%). They also differed in the types of natural hazard and cancer, as well as community resilience and social vulnerability.

conclusionsWe identified several geographical areas in the United States with increased need, which may serve as priority areas for future research around the impacts of environmental exposures on cancer continuum. On a public health level, they also may guide prioritization efforts for environmental hazard planning and preparation.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesCancer centersClimate changeEnvironmental hazardsSpatial correlation

Identifiers

PMID40434568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.