Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40434562›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2025

Estimated health and economic effects associated with over- and under-exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation in Australia and New Zealand using the SUNEX simulation model.

Louisa G Collins, Thomas M Elliott, Ann Webb, Ian R Reid, Craig Sinclair, Tracy Comans, Jonathan Karnon, Anna Foeglein, Karen van Gorp, Vanessa Fanning and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louisa G CollinsViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Q4006, Australia. LouisaCollins@cancerqld.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-4249
Thomas M ElliottPopulation Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Q4006, Australia.
Ann WebbDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Ian R ReidDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Craig SinclairCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
Tracy ComansFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Q4029, Australia.
Jonathan KarnonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, SA5042, Australia.
Anna FoegleinHeisenberg Analytics, Brisbane, QLD, 4068, Australia.
Karen van GorpMelanoma Patients Australia, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Vanessa FanningLived Experience Expert Panel, Multiple Sclerosis Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachel E NealePopulation Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Q4006, Australia.

Funding

Cancer Australia #2000511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple health problems are associated with either over- or under-exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Using an agent-based microsimulation model, we examined the joint health and economic effects of conditions arising from over-exposure to sunlight (i.e., melanoma, keratinocyte skin carcinoma (KC) and cataract) and under-exposure to sunlight via vitamin D deficiency (i.e., fragility fractures and multiple sclerosis). We developed an agent-based model to estimate and compare incident cases, disease-specific deaths, healthcare costs and losses in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) attributable to over- or under-exposure to UV radiation. Simulations were performed over a 20-year period for populations in 14 locations across Australia and New Zealand. Conditions caused by over-exposure to UV radiation were predicted to result in 6.0 and 1.2 million new cases compared with 0.12 and 0.08 million cases from under-exposure in Australia and New Zealand, respectively. However, the number of deaths due to under-exposure (Australia: 58,503; New Zealand: 20,104) were higher than those arising from over-exposure (Australia: 49,320; New Zealand: 7136), but this was dependent on the definition of vitamin D deficiency used. The expected healthcare costs from over-exposure to UV radiation were AU$12.4 billion in Australia and NZ$5.2 billion in New Zealand, three-fold higher than costs for conditions attributable to under-exposure in both countries. Despite the enormous burden of skin cancers, highlighting the importance of sun protection, avoidable deaths and healthcare costs of fragility fractures due to a lack of UV radiation requires a reduction in vitamin D deficiency in Australians and New Zealanders.

Indexed as

SunlightUltraviolet RaysAustraliaComputer SimulationHumansMelanomaNew ZealandQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSkin NeoplasmsVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DAgent-based modelHealthcare costsQuality-adjusted life yearsSun exposureUltraviolet radiation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.