ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapies in Germany 2016-2022.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bempedoic Acid: From Guidelines to the Real World.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- Choosing the Right Non-Statin Therapy for the Right Patient - How To Sequence Advanced Lipid-Lowering Therapies.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the availability of effective LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering drugs, only a minority of patients achieves the guideline-recommended treatment targets. This analysis describes treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in Germany.
methodsHealth claims data were used to identify patients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk who received a LLT prescription 2016-2022. Treatment pathways and the time to switch or discontinue LLT were analysed for statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (BA), and PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).
resultsOut of 3,487,827 insured persons, 247,529 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent first-line LLT were statins in 96.3%. Ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i were first-line LLT in only 0.9%, 0.061%, and 0.046%, respectively. Only few patients experienced a change in their treatment regimen following LLT initiation. Prescriptions of BA and PCSK9i were mainly second-, third-, or fourth-line add-on treatment. Termination of treatment with BA and PCSK9i was less frequent compared to statins and ezetimibe. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 1.45, 1.04, 0.60, and 2.45 years for statins, ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i, respectively, and the median time to switch therapy was 4.81 and 4.87 years for ezetimibe and PCSK9i, respectively (median not reached for statins and BA).
conclusionsChanges in LLT were only observed in a minority of patients. BA and PCSK9i were switched more frequently than statins and ezetimibe. BA was discontinued earlier, and PCSK9i later than the other agents. Continued efforts to maintain long-term adherence and overcome therapeutic inertia are needed to realise the potential of available LLT with proven cardiovascular benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.